Roman
Empire
territory
controlled by ancient Rome. The Romans built up their empire through conquest
or annexation between the 3rd century BC and the 3rd century AD. At its
height, the Roman Empire stretched from north-western Europe to the Near
East and encompassed all the lands of the Mediterranean.
The
control of an empire of this scale depended on a tightly controlled system
of administration, a strong and disciplined army, and excellent communications.
Provinces of the empire were controlled by Roman governors appointed by
the emperor. The Roman army and a number of strategically placed forts
ensured that the empire was defended against hostile local peoples, and
an efficient network of roads
was built both to allow troops to move swiftly within the empire and to
facilitate trade. Taxes levied and valuable commodities such as grain,
minerals, and slaves enriched Rome and financed its army. The many diverse
peoples and cultures whose countries became part of the Roman Empire were,
to varying degrees, united by Roman culture and Roman ideals of government
and citizenship.
The
formation of the Roman Empire began under the Roman
Republic,
but was formed mostly by the early Roman emperors, and is often thought
of as belonging particularly to the imperial dynasties who held power
in Rome after the collapse of the old Republican constitution. By the
end of the 1st century AD, the Roman Empire was already the greatest empire
of the ancient world. However, at the end of the 5th century AD, various
economic factors and ceaseless pressure from barbarian peoples on the
frontiers of the empire led to its eventual collapse in western Europe.
An eastern Empire, based on Constantinople (now stanbul),
continued for far longer.
The
Beginnings of Empire
The
early history of the city of Rome
saw its gradual domination, first under the Kings
of Rome
and then under the Roman Republic, of the Italian peninsula. The emergence
of this small but powerful city-state inevitably brought it into conflict
with other Mediterranean powers, particularly with some of the states
of Greece and with Carthage.
The protracted series of wars which Rome fought in order to establish
itself as the major Mediterranean power led to the conquest and annexation
of territories belonging to its rivals: in this way Rome acquired Sicily
(241 BC); the twin province of Sardinia and Corsica (238 BC); most of
Spain (197 BC); Macedonia and parts of northern Africa (146 BC); and the
lands of Pergamum in Asia Minor (133 BC). Further territory was added
as a result of the campaigns of Julius
Caesar
(leading to the conquest of the rest of Spain and of northern Gaul) and
during the Civil Wars of the later 1st century BC (including, most importantly,
the Provinces
of Africa
and of Egypt). By 27 BC, when Octavianus, having emerged from the chaos
of the Civil Wars without significant rival to his powers, adopted the
title "Augustus" and so became the first Roman emperor, the
foundations of the empire were already laid, and Rome was already the
leading power, in the western world.
In
the early years of the Roman Empire, each province was given its own constitution,
agreed and loosely supervised by the Senate
in Rome. For each province a governor was appointed; although, in theory,
the tenure of governors lasted one year, in practice, their terms of office
were often extended. By the time of Augustus, a hierarchy of provinces
had developed: some, considered "public provinces", were administered
by proconsular governors, appointed by the Senate, with no responsibility
for the command of troops. The remainder were imperial provinces, effectively
governed by appointees of the emperor. For the more peaceful and stable
imperial provinces, in which no more than a single legion of troops was
based, the governor was a former praetor (magistrate); the more heavily
garrisoned provinces were ruled by governors drawn from the ranks of former
consuls (chief magistrates). There were also some provinces in which the
governor was of equestrian rank (drawn from the lower echelons of the
Roman nobility): Judaea, annexed in 6 BC after the collapse of the client
kingdom of Herod,
was an equestrian province, as was Egypt (which long had a special status
on account of its great wealth and strategic importance). In times of
crisis, a serving consul might be sent out to govern a province: this
happened in Sicily after a serious slave revolt in 134 BC. Aided by a
procurator, who was charged with financial affairs, the governor was responsible
for the running of the province, day-to-day matters being settled by a
series of local and town councils. The provincial constitution would deal
with, among other matters, the status of free towns and ports within the
province; with the rights of the inhabitants (whether or not Roman citizens);
and with the types and levels of taxation which were to be paid by the
provincials.
Each
province was usually made up of civitates, local communities that
were to some extent self-administering, and often roughly equivalent to
the national or tribal groupings existing before annexation of the territory
by Rome. At this early period the great majority of provincials were peregrini,
citizens of a Roman province albeit without the rights of Roman citizens:
many exceptions could, however, be found, in settlements such as the coloniae
(legally regarded as virtual extensions of Rome itself) and in municipia
to which citizen status had been granted. Until at least the late 1st
century AD, however, it is true to say that the provinces of the empire
were entirely subordinate to the Italian homeland.
From
the beginning, the economic benefits of empire made themselves felt in
Rome, and the city soon grew to depend upon the influx of provincial wealth.
Taxes in kind, especially of grain, were enough to upset the balance of
Italian agriculture, while the wealth of Spanish mines, of exotic goods,
of slaves, and of custom dues from far-off caravan
routes allowed huge programmes of public works in Rome and allowed its
inhabitants relief from their own taxes. Increasingly, however, much of
this wealth was required to sustain the ever-larger army needed to garrison
and maintain the empire.
1st-Century
Consolidation and Expansion
Rome's
future as an imperial power was affirmed by Augustus,
who set out to stabilize and formalize the rather haphazard and vaguely
defined boundaries of Roman possessions. This objective was approached
in two ways, according to circumstance: either by direct military conquest
or, more subtly, by encouraging client kingdoms in strategic buffer zones,
where the services of friendly local rulers could be bought or otherwise
gained, and would offer a measure of security along the borders. This
policy was used particularly to ally Rome to some of the sophisticated
dynasties of the east, buying protection against the Scythian
and Parthian
peoples who threatened Asia
Minor.
Further east, however, legions were stationed in Syria to make a permanent
frontier of the Euphrates
and the edge of the Arabian
Desert.
In
Europe, the land of Gaul,
which had been conquered by Julius Caesar, was organized into four provinces,
and the older possessions in Spain into three. Attempts to find tenable
frontiers for the Rhine and Danube provinces, however, were less straightforward,
and attempts to push beyond the Rhine, and so to remove the threat posed
by the Germanic
peoples,
led to one of Rome's most humiliating defeats when an army under Publius
Quinctilius Varus was virtually wiped out in the Teutoberg Forest (the
clades Variani; literally, "the catastrophe of Vares").
The eventual Roman withdrawal to the natural frontier suggested by the
great rivers left the provinces of Upper and Lower Germany with a total
of eight legions, with a further seven in the Danube provinces—an indication
of Roman concern about the security of this border. Augustus, however,
had been so shattered by the humiliation of the loss of Germany that he
instructed his successor, Tiberius,
not to increase further Rome's territories.
The
machinery of empire consolidated by Augustus was inherited by his successors.
Tiberius (ruled AD 14-37) annexed the client kingdom of Cappadocia
(annexation being a policy commonly applied when clientage arrangements
for any reason broke down). The next significant territorial expansion,
however, was the invasion of Britain, in AD 43, under Claudius.
Partly justified in commercial terms and partly as a move to prevent British
support of potentially rebellious Gaulish tribes, this adventure was probably
largely a quest for personal prestige by the emperor, who played an active
personal part in the conquest and consolidation. Although some difficulty
was experienced in establishing a safe northern boundary (eventually to
be established by the building of Hadrian's
Wall,
which became the ultimate northern boundary of the empire), Britain rapidly
became drawn into the Roman provincial modes of life, with several flourishing
cities, including Camulodunum (now Colchester), the original provincial
capital, and many minor towns. Claudius took a close interest in the provinces
of the empire and did much to extend Roman citizenship by founding coloniae
and municipiae, especially in Gaul. He also introduced measures
to draw provincials into the higher ranks of Roman administration, particularly
into the Senate: this did much to underline the increasing parity of the
provinces with the Italian homeland, to which they were previously completely
subordinate.
The
Julio-Claudian dynasty came to an end with the murder of Claudius's deranged
successor, Nero,
in AD 68. The following year of dynastic struggle has been graphically
named "the year of the four Emperors". From the turmoil emerged
the able Vespasian,
first of the Flavian Emperors. He and his sons Titus
and Domitian
ruled successively until 96, and maintained the empire. New territory
was added in Germany, east of the Rhine, and the eastern frontiers were
greatly improved and strengthened. The empire was not, however, to grow
for much longer: forces were at work, both internally and externally,
which were to bring about the protracted end of the Roman Empire.
2nd-Century
Retrenchment
For
a while, however, the provinces flourished. The dynasty of the Antonines
began in 96 with the murder of Domitian and his succession by Nerva:
when, two years later, the Imperial purple passed to the Spanish-born
Trajan
(ruled 98-117), the Roman world had for the first time a ruler who was
himself a provincial. From this time, it is possible to see the empire
develop as a genuinely cosmopolitan community. Though, ultimately, it
was Italy and Rome which mattered and which were subsidized by provincial
revenues, there was at the same time a considerable amount of shared interest,
as well as common culture and institutions.
Trajan
tried to increase the extent of the empire and, indeed, it was under his
reign that it briefly reached what was to be its greatest size. His armies
pushed as far as the shores of the Persian
Gulf
and two new provinces—Mesopotamia
and Assyria—were
created. These new possessions could not be consolidated, however, and
were soon relinquished by Hadrian
(ruled 117-138), who was far more concerned with safeguarding the existing
provinces than with acquiring new ones.
Hadrian
took a close, personal interest in the empire, and travelled extensively
through every part of Rome's dominions. He was an able and just administrator
with an interest in philosophy. His long reign was, by and large, a period
of peace, stability, and prosperity. Perhaps his most lasting gift to
the empire was the system of formal, defended frontiers which he established
in Britain and along the Rhine and Danube. He was succeeded by Antoninus
Pius
(ruled 138-161), a Gaul married to a Spanish wife: Antoninus Pius continued
the imperial policies of Hadrian, and the strongly garrisoned frontiers
remained intact.
Crisis
was to come in the following reign, that of the Stoic
philosopher Marcus
Aurelius
(ruled 161-180). The expansion of Barbarian tribes outside the empire
was producing ever more pressure on available territory, and the productive
lands of the Roman provinces were irresistibly attractive not only to
casual raiders and looters but, more importantly, to expanding or dispossessed
peoples looking for land on which to settle. For a while the whole of
the empire in the west was threatened when a host of Germanic tribes,
the most powerful of whom were the Marcomanni, smashed through the Danube
frontier, overran the adjacent provinces, and pushed as far as northern
Italy, where they lay siege to Apuleia. After a long and grimly fought
war, they were pushed back, but the pattern of barbarian pressure and
incursion was to continue.
The
Empire at its Height
At
its greatest extent, the Roman Empire included all the lands bordering
on the Mediterranean Sea, and reached far into northern Europe and the
Near East. The northern limit was in Britain where, after an unsuccessful
Antonine attempt to annex southern Scotland, the frontier was eventually
established on Hadrian's Wall, which stretched from the Tyne to the Solway.
The whole of the Iberian Peninsula was occupied, and divided into the
provinces of Tarraconensis, Baetica, and Lusitania.
Gaul extended as far as the Rhine, and comprised Gallia Narbonensis (Provence
and the south); Gallia Aquitania (south of the Loire); Gallia Lugdunensis
(between Loire and Seine); and Gallia Belgica (northern France reaching
to Germania Inferior on the banks of the Rhine). Along the southern bank
of the Danube lay the provinces of Rhaetia, Noricum, and Pannonia. As
well as the whole of Italy, the whole of Greece was in Roman possession,
with the Balkan provinces of Moesia, Thrace,
and Dacia.
Virtually the whole of the coastal strip of northern Africa was part of
the empire, divided into the provinces of Africa, Mauretania, Numidia,
Cyrenaica,
and Aegyptus (Egypt).
In
the east, Rome held the whole of Asia Minor (Bithynia,
Galatia,
Pontus,
Cappadocia, and Cilicia)
as well as the province of Syria: further lands in Armenia and Iraq had
been given up by Hadrian. Roman influence spread even further than the
far-flung boundaries of this Empire: major trade routes, especially to
the Orient, had been opened, and Roman goods have been found as far east
as India and as far west as Ireland.
Clearly,
the empire included a bewildering racial mixture, from the shaggy, trouser-wearing
Celtic
people of northern Britain to the sophisticated townsfolk of Damascus
or Alexandria.
In practice, it is usual to think of a western Empire of Britain, Gaul,
Spain, and the provinces of the Rhine and the Danube; and an eastern Empire
in Greece, Asia, and Africa. The distinction became clearer as the east
inevitably adopted Greek
as its main language while, for most formal purposes, the west was dominated
by Latin.
National and regional identities were not, as a rule, suppressed by the
empire: rather, the multitude of provincials rapidly came to regard themselves
as at least partly Roman while maintaining their specific identity. An
important turning-point came in 212, when the Emperor Caracalla
extended full Roman citizenship to all free-born subjects of the empire,
abolishing the distinction between Roman and provincial, and so doing
much to create a common sense of Romanitas (an identity with the
traditions and institutions of the Roman world).
The
Spread of Roman Culture and Customs
The
extent to which Roman culture and Roman institutions were eagerly adopted
by the peoples of newly acquired provinces is remarkable: even the Britons,
remote inhabitants of a semi-mythical island at the very edge of the known
world, adopted with great speed the cosmopolitan, provincial culture of
the Roman Empire. In the earliest periods of Romanization, much was probably
due to social competition among the native people, whose prestige might
be enhanced by possessions or manners which might associate them with
such a powerful and successful society as that of Rome. This argument
applies most convincingly to the less developed native societies of the
west: thus the upper classes of the Celtic peoples of Gaul and Britain,
even before Roman conquest, measured their social success in terms of
their access to wine from the Roman world, and to the paraphernalia of
wine-drinking: British chieftains were buried with jars of imported wine
and with the cups and mixing-bowls which formed part of the ritual of
wine-drinking, and their armour and weaponry were influenced by Roman
technological development.
There
was, then, a considerable taste for Roman material goods already established
in some provinces even before they were drawn into the empire. Once a
province had become part of the empire, and Romans were seen to be the
dominant group, it is probable that the desire to be associated with Roman
ways and to seem to be Roman grew among the native people. The Romans
themselves were also anxious that natives should become civilized Roman
provincials (and, later, citizens): they were also, however, quick to
adopt provincial styles and customs which they found attractive, so that
the empire became a melting-pot of cultural influences.
In
the east, the situation was rather different. Here were existing, highly
structured societies, usually based around networks of towns and cities,
and with traditions of civilization which reached back for centuries.
Rome found it relatively easy to administer these provinces: the basic
structure of government, of urban life, of taxation, communications, and
administration was already in place. In cultural terms, however, the ancient
societies of the east did not become Romanized to the same extent as the
"barbarian" societies of the west: they were already secure
in an ancient identity, the culture and institutions of Rome (themselves
largely derived from ancient
Greece)
were less of a novelty, and, because things already worked with a fair
degree of efficiency, the Romans felt less compulsion to impose change
in order to be able to exploit and administer.
The
first contact which most people in the "barbarian" western provinces
had with the Roman world was with the army, and the army became one of
the most important early forces behind Romanization of the provinces.
From an early date, provincials and members of conquered nations were
enlisted into the Roman army (although the elite regiments, the legions,
were reserved for Roman citizens). By the end of the 1st century, the
army was mostly non-Italian: in the later Empire, troops of Germanic origin
became increasingly important. The army brought many native people into
contact with Roman ways and Roman money and, after discharge, a soldier
could be eligible for Roman citizenship. The practice of settling retired
legionary troops in coloniae, model towns often situated in newly
conquered territory, was also important, providing shining examples of
the advantages of civilized (that is to say, Romanized) life. On a smaller
scale, native people were encouraged to settle in vici, small civil
settlements on the margins of forts, where they would be in close contact
with, and be economically dependent upon, the occupying garrison.
Towns
and Cities
Despite
the obvious economic importance of the countryside, Roman life was characteristically
the life of the cities and towns. Romans considered the city an essential
part of civilization, and it is certainly true that, especially in the
west (where settlement had previously been almost entirely rural), the
creation of cities and towns was one of the most dramatic effects of Roman
rule. Native people gravitated towards the towns: not only the upper classes,
who were often enrolled as councillors and magistrates, but also the artisans
and craftsmen who rapidly adopted the new styles and technologies.
Provincial
towns could be of great magnificence, and were regularly distinguished
by fine public buildings, temples, and other amenities. As early as the
reign of Augustus, the city of Augustodunum (Autun), in central Gaul,
was given walls and magnificent gates in a distinctive North Italian style
which would not be disgraced by any building in Rome itself. The recently
recognized basilica
(the administrative headquarters) of Roman London was one of the largest
in the empire. Public buildings such as the theatre at Arausio (Orange)
or the amphitheatre at Arelate (Arles) are, even today, of breathtaking
magnificence, and testimony to the importance, not solely of the provincial
towns, but of communal, urban life.
Life
in the Country
The
effects of Romanization were also felt in the countryside. An immediate
factor was the need to meet the demands of Roman taxation, and to produce
a surplus to feed the non-productive populations of the towns. In northern
Britain the amount of land under cultivation increased dramatically at
about the time of the arrival of the Roman army: this probably reflects
the new demands that were being placed on the productive capacity of the
countryside. A major transformation of the rural landscape was brought
about by the introduction of the centralized and highly capitalized villa
system of agriculture, which in some areas seems to have dominated the
farming economy. Elsewhere, however, the impact of Roman rule upon the
peasantry was probably less than it was upon those living in the towns.
Individual farmsteads often continued to function without a break in much
the same way as before Roman conquest, though the material possessions
of the people were usually transformed, with pottery, glass, pins, and
small metal objects, all in Roman provincial style, appearing at an early
date at most rural ites. There is evidence that Latin (in the west) was
adopted almost universally,
both
in town and in the country.
Religion
As
Roman rule and Roman culture spread, so did Roman religion. The Romans
were remarkably eclectic in religious matters: while there were certain
observances which had to be made, they were reluctant to exclude any other
religious belief, and happy to accept most of the gods and practices of
the subject peoples of the empire. Rare exceptions were made in such cases
as those of the Druids
of Gaul, considered politically dangerous as well as unacceptable on account
of their practice of human sacrifice,
and of the early Christians, who insisted on the exclusive truth of their
belief and so challenged the divine authority of the emperor. Usually,
however, the Romans were content to apply a doctrine known as interpretatio
Romana (literally "Roman translation"), under which native
gods were seen as equivalent to, or as aspects of, the more familiar gods
of Rome. In this way the Celtic war-god Camulos was considered as being
equivalent to Mars,
and Brigantia, tutelary goddess of the northern Britons, was represented
as Minerva
Victrix.
This
doctrine made the spread of Roman religion throughout the empire remarkably
easy. At the same time, Roman society absorbed many religious trends from
the provinces: the cults of Mithras,
Isis,
Osiris,
and, eventually, Christianity
were all imported. Particularly important was the way in which religion,
either as the cults of deified emperors or of those associated with living
emperors (such as that of the Unconquered Sun in the 3rd century), was
used to reinforce and to legitimize the secular power of the imperial
dynasties.
Decline
and Fall
From
the beginning of the 3rd century, the Roman Empire was on the defensive,
beset by economic and social problems from inside and faced with barbarian
pressure from outside. Septimius Severus (ruled 193-211), after fighting
bloody civil wars to establish his power, managed to extend Roman possessions
in Mesopotamia, but was occupied in turning back a tide of barbarian invaders
in northern Britain when he died in York. Under his reign, Italy lost
many of its privileges, and had to pay provincial taxes: this was a symptom
of the pressure which the demands of a huge army and growing civil service
were placing upon the empire's revenues.
The
accession of Septimius Severus marked the beginning of a period in which
the relatively ordered, hereditary imperial dynasties began to break down.
Real power lay with the army, and it was up to the army to approve, or
even to appoint, a new emperor. At times, this could reduce the succession
to a squalid auction, at which the candidate who offered the greatest
cash bribe to the troops was likely to take control. Costly and damaging
civil wars between competing claimants became increasingly common. The
effect could only be to damage the stability of the empire and to divert
military attention from external threats.
In
238 came massive attacks by Germanic tribes on the Black Sea area. By
253 the Goths
and the Heruli
had ravaged the shores of the Aegean, and in 267 Athens was taken. At
the same time, the Danube frontier came under great pressure, and the
province of Dacia was effectively abandoned. In 259 the Allemanni, a huge
confederacy of German tribes, attacked eastern Gaul, penetrated as far
as Spain, and linked up with other Germanic groups in the west. German
tribes occupied northern Italy. In the east came renewed trouble with
the Parthians, culminating in the ultimate humiliation of the Emperor
Valerian
being captured by the forces of the Parthian king, Shapur, who pushed
the Roman Empire back to the Euphrates. In 270 Zenobia,
queen of the formerly friendly Syrian city-state of Palmyra,
invaded Egypt and adjacent territories. Some recovery from these disasters
was achieved by Aurelian
(ruled 270-275), who defeated both Palmyra and the German tribes, but
the situation continued to be volatile, and the position of the empire
precarious.
Major
reorganization of the empire was undertaken by Diocletian
(ruled 284-305), who formally divided Roman territory into a Western Empire
and an Eastern Empire, each administered by an Augustus (senior
emperor) and a junior Caesar (subordinate emperor)—a system known
as the Tetrarchy.
Imperial power, increasingly absolute and arbitrary, was enforced by a
large secret police force (the agentes in rebus). Diocletian also
undertook radical reforms of the army, and of the defences of the provinces.
The twin empires were again united by Constantine
(ruled 306-337), who adopted Christianity (formerly a relatively unimportant
cult) and who moved the centre of imperial government from Rome to the
new city of Constantinople, in Asia Minor. This last was an extraordinary
move: it recognized that the empire in the east was now the primary concern,
and broke a chain of historical and political continuity which had been,
for immemorial ages, at the heart of Roman identity. On Constantine's
death the empire was again divided formally into Eastern and Western,
between his sons Constans and Constantius
II.
The
second half of the 4th century was a time of military reverses. Picts
and Scots invaded Britain in 360 and, though the barbarians were temporarily
defeated by Theodosius
in 370, the legions were forced to begin their abandonment of the province
in 383 (a process completed by 410) in order to reinforce the severely
pressed frontiers elsewhere. Huns
and Goths were invading Europe from several points, and in 378 the Emperor
Valens
was defeated and killed by Visigoths
at Adrianople (now Edirne), in Thrace. The Emperor Theodosius (ruled 392-395)
briefly reunited the empire and tried to rally Roman forces against the
barbarian tide, but nothing could be done. In 396 Alaric,
king of the Visigoths, began a campaign that was to sweep through Greece
and the Balkans to Italy: in 410 he sacked the city of Rome itself and,
though Italy was briefly to be reconquered by the Byzantine general Belisarius
in 535, the ancient heartland of the empire was now lost.
Over
the following century, the Western Empire fell steadily into barbarian
hands. Desperately short of troops, Rome had adopted the despairing policy
of allowing some Germanic foedorati (people with whom the Romans,
by treaty, had agreed friendly association or alliance in perpetuity)
to settle in the European provinces in return for guaranteeing the borders
against other, more hostile, tribes: in this way, much of Europe was to
fall under barbarian rule and occupation by clandestine means. Vandals
were settled in Spain; Ostrogoths in Dalmatia;
and Huns in Pannonia
and other parts of eastern Europe. In 443, the Vandals took Rome's last
possessions in northern Africa. The final end of the Western Empire came
in 476 with the death of its last emperor, Romulus
Augustulus,
ironically named after one of the twin founders of Rome, and the proclamation
of the German barbarian general Odoacer as king of Italy.
In
the east, the empire was to continue, in one form or another, for many
centuries, but the days were over when the empire could be called Roman:
the lands governed from Constantinople are usually referred to as the
Byzantine
Empire,
and were eventually to fall to the Muslim Turks in 1453.
The
causes of the collapse of this mighty Empire are more complex than the
simple series of military defeats outlined above. In essence, the empire
had grown too big for its resources. Extended frontiers required a huge
army, always a vast drain on revenues, and in turn generating an increasingly
unwieldy bureaucracy: too many unproductive mouths were being fed by too
few farmers and peasants. This situation was worsened in the areas most
exposed to barbarian invasion, where conditions were most unstable. Political
competition between rivals for power resulted in continual civil wars,
which drained the exchequer, depleted manpower, and exhausted the countryside.
Massive rates of inflation, following debasement of the coinage in order
to increase the money supply to pay the army and administrators, reduced
confidence in the currency and inhibited economic production. Roman society
had become inflexible and fossilized, caught in a cycle of economic depression
and bureaucratic stagnation. All these factors were exacerbated by the
ceaseless pressure on the frontiers of the empire, and by the constant
need for more troops and more taxes.
The
Roman Inheritance
By
the Europe of the early Middle
Ages,
the Roman Empire was remembered, though sometimes dimly, as an age of
stability, power, and achievement: it was Rome which largely shaped the
culture and institutions of medieval Europe, and bestowed a lasting legacy.
The
Germanic people who gained the western Roman Empire were conscious of
the achievements of Rome, but were unfortunately not always organized
in a way that would allow them immediately to build upon the inheritance.
Their adoption of Roman culture and institutions was, therefore, far from
uniform, and the lasting legacy of Rome can be difficult to perceive.
In Italy, in Iberia, and to a lesser extent in France and some of the
Balkan states, the language spoken is still based closely upon Latin:
all the Germanic invaders were illiterate in their own tongues, and such
learning and higher culture as was to survive in Europe in the centuries
following the fall of the empire was conducted in Latin. Moreover, the
very survival of that learning is owed to the Christian Church, itself
a Roman institution which was to outlive the empire that produced it.
It
was the Church, more than anything, that was the real heir of the empire,
and which was able to provide a measure of continuity after the collapse
of temporal power and civil administration. The papacy
continued to be based in Rome and to exert enormous authority over most
of Europe, keeping alive not only many of the ideas of the Roman world
but also a sense of a wider community which looked to the ancient city
for support and leadership.
Besides
the Church, some of the most important institutions of the medieval world
had their origins in the Roman Empire. The feudal
system, which was to govern not only the holding and administration of
land but also the web of relationships and obligations that held together
medieval society, has been seen as developing from the late Roman system
of land law. In places, other traditions of Roman
law
and administration survived, and the courts of the more sophisticated
Germanic peoples—Franks,
Goths, Burgundians—were modelled upon the imperial courts of Rome. Five
hundred years after the fall of the city, Roman styles continued to dominate
material culture, art, and, in particular, architecture. The barbarian
races had coveted Rome and what the empire represented: it is true to
say that they did not destroy the Roman legacy, but used it, adapted it,
and integrated it into their own cultures.
Contributed
By:
Percival
Turnbull
Quelle:
Microsoft Encarta |
|
|